Friday, September 4, 2015

Kim Davis: Rowan County Kentucky Clerk Did Not Break The Law - The Judge Did

Did Kentucky court clerk, Kim Davis, violate the law and should she have been jailed? The answer is
quite clear: Davis upheld the law, and the judge’s order is unlawful and, indeed, criminal and tyrannical.

According to Kentucky Revised Statutes Chapter 402.005, marriage is defined as:

As used and recognized in the law of the Commonwealth, “marriage” refers only to the civil status, condition, or relation of one (1) man and one (1) woman united in law for life, for the discharge to each other and the community of the duties legally incumbent upon those whose association is founded on the distinction of sex.

The chapter also goes on to point out that Davis was right in following the law as to who is not permitted to receive a marriage license. 402.010 reads:

Degree of relationship that will bar marriage. (1) No marriage shall be contracted between persons who are nearer of kin to each other by consanguinity, whether of the whole or half-blood, than second cousins. (2) Marriages prohibited by subsection (1) of this section are incestuous and void.

The chapter continues in 402.020 to prohibit other marriages, including those between members of the same sex, spouses who are married and seeking another marriage without divorce and polygamy.

Finally, it is noteworthy that 402.080 states, “No marriage shall be solemnized without a license therefor. The license shall be issued by the clerk of the county in which the female resides at the time, unless the female is eighteen (18) years of age or over or a widow, and the license is issued on her application in person or by writing signed by her, in which case it may be issued by any county clerk.”

So, Kim Davis has followed the laws of Kentucky and, I might add, the laws of God concerning marriage. Who then is the violator of law in this matter? First, the sodomites are the violators of these laws in their attempt to get a marriage license. Second, the judge in the matter is in violation of the law by ordering Davis to do what is unlawful.

Frankly, it seems high time the people of Kentucky stop protesting and start demanding that Judge David Bunning and members of the Supreme Court be impeached and that sodomites be held accountable lawfully for their criminal behavior. Like I’ve said before, if we would deal with the crime of sodomy lawfully, we wouldn’t be at this crossroads where so many people are confused about marriage.



A full list of marriage law statutes in Kentucky can be found here, which were written by the representatives of the people in the Kentucky legislature.

7 comments:

  1. Thank You.... Bunch of retarded liberal butt licking twirps

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wrong on all accounts. I suggest you actually study up on how our country works. The scotus ruled that laws banning same sex marriage violated the 14th amendment. And "gods law" doesn't supercede the Constitution

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually you're the one wrong here. Firstly, the SCOTUS completely overstepped its boundaries by MAKING A LAW recognizing same sex marriages. But that's Congress' job - to make laws, and no Congress ever passed any laws or statutes mandating and requiring that people like Kim Davis (in their positions) must issue licenses to homosexuals. And anyway, the 14th amendment - as well as the 13th and 15th - clearly are about the legal rights of slaves after the civil war, coequally called the "civil war amendments". It has absolutely and positively nothing to do with same sex marriage. Only a bafoonish and activist supreme court so badly misconstrues an amendment of the constitution like that - and that's exactly what we have. I suggest you study constitutional law to see how the constitution is supposed to be interpreted (called "originalism").

      Delete
  3. Bunning should have been recused based on prior homosexuality ties to the community. Someone else in the office could have performed the service and the 14th amendment guarantees equality. KY should also have timely changed their laws to support the Supreme Court decision. Blame for many....

    ReplyDelete